tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4408995960088977639.post1791612894194260130..comments2023-09-03T06:27:31.792-04:00Comments on THE SOMETIMES PREACHER: Inerrant or Infallibleandyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13417720112665220722noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4408995960088977639.post-78437900427095770342011-08-04T23:53:56.365-04:002011-08-04T23:53:56.365-04:00Indeed!
S.Indeed!<br />S.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4408995960088977639.post-88641816422106351342011-08-04T19:39:15.485-04:002011-08-04T19:39:15.485-04:00Stan, glad you found it helpful. It was certainly ...Stan, glad you found it helpful. It was certainly helpful for me to get these thoughts out. In doing research for a class I taught on the development of the canon, I discovered that the early church didn't consider the inspiration of Scripture anything unique. For them, it seemed, anything that was orthodox was "inspired". Interesting perspective, no?andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13417720112665220722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4408995960088977639.post-78172618976703787882011-08-04T17:41:56.771-04:002011-08-04T17:41:56.771-04:00Thank you, Andy. I've had a few conversations ...Thank you, Andy. I've had a few conversations about the differences between "inerrant" and "infallible" in the past; future conversations will go (even) better having read this. For what it's worth, the Christian Reformed Church uses the word "infallible" together with "inspired" and "authoritative" (http://www.crcna.org/pages/positions_authority.cfm). Blessings to you! ~StanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com